PHWP: Abstract Detail: Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships

Resources for Employers

Articles & Research Abstracts

Complete Reference

Title

Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships

Available Online http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/apl/95/4/713/
Publication Date July 2010
Author Jeremy Beus, Stephanie Payne, Mindy Bergman and Winfred Arthur
Source Journal of Applied Psychology
Source Type Journal Article
Summary

In this quantitative review, the authors seek to clarify the relationship between safety climate and worker injuries. The authors note that employee injuries were better predictors of organizational safety climate than safety climate was of injuries and that the injury-safety climate relationship was stronger for organizational climate than for psychological climate. Moderator analyses indicate that content contamination in safety climate measures increased the size of climate-injury relationships, content deficiency in climate measures reduced these effects, and the effect also decreased when injury data were collected over longer periods of time. The single best predictor of injuries on the job is perceived management commitment to safety.

Keywords injury, meta-analysis, organizational safety climate, psychological safety climate
Reference

Beus, J. M., Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2010). Safety climate and injuries: An examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 713-727.

"Coleman Professional Services believes that supporting our employees in a modern and clean work environment can only lead to better services to our customers. We are proud of our employees and we are very proud of being recognized as a Psychologically Healthy Workplace Award Winner."

Nelson Burns
CEO
Coleman Professional Services